Very often, affirmative action implied too radical measures to promote better social opportunities which all populations would be able to use on equal terms. Unfortunately, affirmative action was initially too misbalanced to resolve the major racial controversies and to provide minority and native populations with equal chances for self-realization. The policies were originally developed to correct decades of discrimination and to give disadvantaged minorities a boost” (Curry 44). seeking better living, and as racism remains an essential component of our social relations with other ethnic populations, affirmative action should remain valid but should be reconstructed in a way that would work to provide everyone with equal opportunities and would eliminate preferential treatment with regard to any ethnic group.Īffirmative action “generally means giving preferential treatment to minorities in admission to universities or employment in government and businesses. Now, as diversity is valued more than any other social concept, as more and more Asians and Latin Americans come to the U.S. To a large extent, the system of affirmative action principles was too misbalanced to eliminate racism and to provide everyone with equal social opportunities. Unfortunately, with the expanding role of affirmative action, American populations have come to realize the discriminative attitudes they were given against preferential treatment of minorities. Given the continuous racial prejudice and the growing percentage of a minority population in the U.S., affirmative action was expected to give minority representatives another chance to make a good career and to obtain a good education. Affirmative action has been designed to resolve the major ethnic/ racial controversies and to provide minority populations with a chance to realize themselves in a foreign society.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |